As 2026 approaches, agencies are finalizing their plans for the year ahead. One challenge we keep hearing again and again: clients don’t fully understand why they need server-side tracking. And even when they agree, they want clear proof that it works.
To help agencies overcome these roadblocks, we’ve hosted a dedicated webinar where we addressed the most common questions, concerns, and objections - backed by real experience from the Stape team and the practical ways our tools can support you.
Speakers:
1. Pitching framework for agencies:
• The most common client pain points and how server-side tracking solves them
• Tools and resources that help you build a strong pitch
• Typical objections (e.g., cost, complexity, unclear ROI) and how to confidently handle them
2. How to prove ROI so clients keep paying:
• How to use the Website Tracking Checker to reveal tracking issues — before & after
• What you can uncover in Stape Analytics and how to show clients these insights
• How to compare pre-/post-setup performance in GA4 or your analytics platform
• What to look for in Meta, Google Ads, TikTok, and LinkedIn to quantify improvements
3. Q&A session.
🔗 You can also download our presentation from the webinar for free!
A high volume of Direct traffic usually indicates issues with tracking configuration rather than with the data transfer method itself. Server-side tracking helps stabilize attribution by improving data delivery reliability, reducing the impact of browser restrictions, and ensuring marketing platforms receive cleaner, more consistent signals. This often results in more accurate channel attribution and a lower share of traffic being misclassified as Direct.
No. Server-side tracking does not grant the legal right to bypass user consent. Consent choices must always be respected, regardless of whether tracking is implemented client-side or server-side. While server-side tracking can improve data quality and delivery for consented users, it cannot be used to collect data from users who have opted out.
Yes. Server-side tracking can improve website performance by reducing the number of third-party scripts executed in the browser. While many platforms (such as Meta, TikTok, and Snap) still require a client-side event to initiate tracking, much of the processing and data delivery can be shifted to the server, resulting in faster page loads and a better user experience.
Agencies should focus on measurable indicators such as:
Stape Analytics can help quantify how much data would otherwise be blocked and how server-side tracking improves delivery. A common approach is to measure metrics before implementation, then compare them 2-4 weeks after deployment to clearly demonstrate impact.
Yes. This setup is supported, and detailed instructions are available in the Stape Helpdesk. It explains how to configure first-party domains using Cloudflare in O2O mode step by step.
Yes. The Stape Care team provides migration assistance for moving from GCP to Stape. This includes setup guidance and hands-on support to ensure a smooth transition.
This is not an issue. You can register an additional agency account in the global zone and manage clients across different regions as needed. This allows you to meet regional hosting requirements while keeping account management flexible.
The answer is both yes and no.
Custom Loader itself does not prolong cookie lifetime. However, it plays a critical role in making GTM scripts harder for ad blockers to detect. Server-side tracking can still work without Custom Loader, but using it significantly improves data recovery from ad blockers. In practice, Custom Loader is strongly recommended for achieving the best results.
Data discrepancies typically come from several sources:
These differences are expected and do not necessarily indicate an issue with tracking.
No. Server-side tracking improves data delivery and reliability, but it does not override platform-specific attribution models, consent requirements, or reporting logic. Some discrepancies will always exist due to how different systems define and count conversions.
Yes. By reducing data loss caused by browser restrictions and ad blockers, server-side tracking provides more consistent signals to marketing platforms. This typically leads to more stable attribution and better optimization over time.
Yes. One of the main benefits of server-side tracking is its ability to recover a portion of data that would otherwise be blocked, especially when combined with first-party domains and Custom Loader.
Yes. While server-side tracking cannot collect data without consent, it ensures that all consented users are tracked more reliably. This maximizes the value of the data you are legally allowed to collect.
No. Client-side tracking is still required to initiate events and capture user interactions. Server-side tracking complements it by handling data processing, enrichment, and delivery more reliably.
Indirectly, yes. By improving data quality and stability, server-side tracking provides better input for platform algorithms, which can lead to improved optimization, more reliable reporting, and better decision-making.
Server-side tracking is most valuable when a business experiences data loss from ad blockers, browser restrictions, or inconsistent attribution, or when accurate measurement is critical for performance marketing and analytics.
Comments